Skip to main content

This website is intended exclusively for healthcare professionals residing and/or working in the KSA.

Early detection programs reduce rates of DKA by up to 90%, preventing severe complications and reducing hospitalization at Stage 3 diagnosis as shown in multiple studies

Significant short-term morbidity and cost, as well as long-term impacts on neurofunction and glycemic control 

*Hospitalization rate, which was mainly driven by DKA in the control patients, was reported rather than DKA in DAISY. DKA, diabetic ketoacidosis; T1D, Type 1 diabetes.

Rates are dramatically reduced with screening and education
 

People that test positive can monitor, prepare and manage progression more effectively resulting in improved beta cells activity & glycemic control at symptoms onset5

FASTING C-PEPTIDE AT CLINICAL MANIFESTATION***

HBA1C AT CLINICAL MANIFESTATION***

Children diagnosed with pre-clinical T1D through public health screening had milder diabetes at clinical manifestation following education and monitoring

The Fr1da study was a program screening over 165,000 children aged 2–5 years for islet autoantibodies in Bavaria, Germany as a model to evaluate population-based screening for early detection of T1D. The main purpose of the screening is to diagnose presymptomatic T1D so that affected children and their families can be educated and monitored, and so that patients can begin insulin therapy early enough to prevent serious metabolic derangements at the onset of clinical disease. The primary outcome was presymptomatic T1D, defined by 2 or more islet autoantibodies, with categorization into stages 1 (normoglycemia), 2 (dysglycemia), or 3 (clinical) T1D. Secondary outcomes were the frequency of DKA and parental psychological stress, assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (range, 0–27; higher scores indicate worse depression; ≤4 indicates no to minimal depression; >20 indicates severe depression).1,2 The DiMelli study was a pediatric diabetes registry that enrolled children with incident Stage 3 T1D diagnosed through the same clinical centers in Bavaria as in the Fr1da study, but without prior screening for islet autoantibodies.2

Most patients will test negative which offers them & their care givers peace of mind especially for family relatives living with T1D.6

Figure 1-Parent SAl scores across time for GP and FDR children with IA - test results.

  • Parents showed high levels of anxiety in response to their child's increased risk of T1D. Mothers were more anxious than fathers and parents with diabetes in their family were more anxious than parents with no history.
  • In response to repeated negative test results, parent anxiety declined to normal levels.

RESULTS 

At study inception, parents showed high levels of anxiety in response to their child's increased genetic type 1 diabetes risk; mothers were more anxious than fathers, and parents with diabetes in the family were more anxious than parents with no family history. In response to repeated IA-negative (IA-) test results, parent anxiety declined to normal levels. Anxiety increased in parents faced with an lA-positive (IA+) test result. Parents faced with two or more types of lA+ test results showed particularly high levels of anxiety (all P < 0.001).

Early detection can further reduce the number of T1D patients commonly misdiagnosed as having T2D7

Misdiagnosis can delay proper insulin replacement therapy, resulting in prolonged hyperglycaemia and increasing risk of DKA

Diabetes screening is associated with similar cost-effective profile as other prevention strategies

Cost per intervention to avoid one event

 Screening of diabetes to prevent DKARSV drug to prevent hospitalization8Immunization to prevent Meningitis B9
Cost (€)

30 (estimate)

350*

167,4*

Positive rate

0,30%

 

 

Cost per individual under protection

10 000

350*

167,4*

Reduction of event by intervention

80,0%

82,0%

79%

Number of event without intervention

40,0%

1,9%

 

Number of event with intervention

10,0%

0,3%

 

Cost per event avoid

27 778

22 702

2 000 000 (Closer to rare disease approach)

* French prices

Screening to avoid DKA alone might not be cost effective, but including lifetime benefits leads to cost effectiveness

Lifetime cost-effectiveness results10

Screening strategy

DKA ratio

Incremental population average  HbA1c per patient

Other diabetes complication  costs over a lifetime**

Incremental Effectiveness  (life years)

Incremental total cost-effectiveness ratio 
(Screening vs. No Screening)***

No screening

58%

Reference

$284,000,000

Reference

Reference

Ages 2 and 6 IAB only

29.6%

-0.24%

$282,000,000

363

$50,000 per life year gained
Both cost effective at <$100,000 per life year gained

Ages 2 and 6 IAB + GRS high risk

33.7%

-0.21%

$283,000,000

363

$6,000 per life year gained

*Both cost effective at <$100,000 per life year gained****

**All costs are in 2024 USD 
***Total costs include screening costs for N=100,000 children and adolescents aged 0-15, T1D onset costs (with and without DKA), and lifetime diabetes complication-related casts for N=504 T1D cases eventually diagnosed within the first 15 years and followed for a lifetime. 
****David J. Vanness, James Lomas, Hannah Ahn. A Health Opportunity Cost Threshold for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in the United States. Ann Intern Med.2021:174:25-32. 

Results are preliminary and subiect to change

People living with certain autoimmune diseases, such as celiac and thyroid, are also more likely to develop aT1D (per ADA, BreakthroughT1D).

Autoimmune Diseases 

  • Autoimmune thyroid disorders affect more than 90% of people with T1D and autoimmune disorders11
  • Around 20% of children with T1D have antithyroid antibodies present at the start of the disease11
  • T1D patients often have other co-existing multi-system autoimmune disorders including thyroid, parathyroid, celiac, vitiligo, gastritis, skin, and rheumatic diseases11

Reference ongoing RWE regarding at-risk population for screening to highlight correlation between autoimmune disease and T1D

Individuals who have family antecedents with aT1D have up to 15x higher risk of developing T1D, per consensus guidelines (ADA, BRT1D, BreakthroughT1D)

The incidence and prevalence of T1D are increasing globally12 

 

The global prevalence of T1D will rise to 13.5–17.4 million by 204013

 

(60–107% rise by 2040)

Only 15% of newly diagnosed people with T1D have a family history of the disease14 

 

15-fold higher risk of developing T1D in first-degree relative15

The risk of cardiovascular complications increases the earlier the age an individual progresses to Stage 316

 

The prevalence of DKA at onset of aT1D is alarmingly high17

Clinical guidelines recommend early detection programs to target familial +/- autoimmune history; and acknowledge value of screening broader populations.

Recommend relatives of people with T1D be informed of the opportunity to be tested for IA in the setting of a clinical research study18 

Recommendations expanded to include IA screening for anyone in the setting of a research study and screening outside of research for 1st degree family members of people with T1D19,20

These recommendations reflected the initiation of general-population screening studies and commercial availability for testing for four T1D IAs21,22

2022 guidelines acknowledge the value of screening the general population and the importance of coupling IA screening with education and monitoring

GULF:
One JLT Building, Level 3, Jumeirah Lake Towers, PO Box 53899, Dubai, UAE .
For further medical information, please contact: For UAE ✆ 800 MEDICAL Toll-Free Number.
For all Gulf countries ✆ +971 45 50 38 63 or email: medical-information.gulf@sanofi.com.
Full prescribing information is available upon request.
To Report adverse events please call: +971 561747001 or email Gulf.Pharmacovigilance@sanofi.com
www.sanofi.com

KSA:
To report any side effect(s):
Saudi Arabia: The National Pharmacovigilance and Drug Safety Centre (NPC
SFDA call center: 19999 • E-mail: npc.drug@sfda.gov.sa • Website: https://ade.sfda.gov.sa/
Full Prescribing Information is available upon request: SANOFI, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, P.O. Box 9874, Jeddah 21423, K.S.A.
Tel: +966-12-669-3318, Fax: +966-12-663-6191
For Medical Information, please contact: +966-12-669-3318ksa.medicalinformation@sanofi.com
For Pharmacovigilance, please contact: +966-54-428-4797ksa_pharmacovigilance@sanofi.com
To report any Product Technical Complaint, please contact SANOFI Quality Department:
Email: quality.greatergulf@Sanofi.com ,  www.sanofi.com.sa

MAT-KW-2600001-V1-Feb 2026