Significant risk reduction in CV hospitalization or death from any cause1
Primary composite endpoint
Time to first CV hospitalization or death from any cause Placebo and Multaq1
Relative risk reduction in the primary composite endpoint was entirely attributable to reduction in CV hospitalization, principally hospitalization related to AFib.
Rates of the primary composite endpoint of CV hospitalization or death from any cause were 31.6% with MULTAQ vs 39.2% with placebo.
MULTAQ reduces the risk of AFib hospitalization with a 39% RRR1
39% RRR in hospitalization due to AFib and other supraventricular arrhythmias.1,*
CV hospitalization rates were 29.1% with MULTAQ vs 36.8% with placebo (HR=0.74; 95% CI: 0.67-0.82; P<0.0001).1
*Hospitalization due to AFib and other supraventricular rhythm disorders was a component of the secondary endpoint of CV hospitalization.1
CV hospitalization in AFib + CAD (post hoc)
ATHENA post hoc analysis primary composite endpoint:
Time to first CV hospitalization or death from any cause in patients with
AFib + CAD (n=1405)2,3
Study limitations3
- Post hoc analysis where potential bias could be introduced, given that patients were randomized based on CAD status. The analysis was retrospective, exploratory, and based on a much smaller population than the full randomized population in the ATHENA trial
- In patients who had a history of CAD, patients receiving MULTAQ had similar rates of any TEAEs and serious TEAEs as patients receiving placebo, but had significantly higher rates of bradycardia, QT interval prolongation, gastrointestinal events, and increases in serum creatinine
ATHENA Post Hoc Analysis
AFib + CAD
Results in the primary composite endpoint were consistent in patients with or without CAD (MULTAQ: 482/1663 or 29.52%; placebo: 567/1590 or 35.66%).3
This post hoc analysis assessed safety and cardiovascular outcomes of MULTAQ in a total of 1405 patients with CAD from the ATHENA study.3
CAD was defined as a documented history of either ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, evidenced by clinically significant left ventricular dilatation secondary to CAD, or CAD, which was defined as acute myocardial infarction and/or the following: significant (≥70%) coronary artery stenosis, history of revascularization procedure (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, stent implantation in a coronary artery, coronary artery bypass grafting, etc), positive exercise test, and positive nuclear scan of cardiac perfusion.3
Significant risk reduction in CV hospitalization or death from any cause1
Primary composite endpoint
Time to first CV hospitalization or death from any cause Placebo and Multaq1
Relative risk reduction in the primary composite endpoint was entirely attributable to reduction in CV hospitalization, principally hospitalization related to AFib.
Rates of the primary composite endpoint of CV hospitalization or death from any cause were 31.6% with MULTAQ vs 39.2% with placebo.
MULTAQ reduces the risk of AFib hospitalization with a 39% RRR1
39% RRR in hospitalization due to AFib and other supraventricular arrhythmias.1,*
CV hospitalization rates were 29.1% with MULTAQ vs 36.8% with placebo (HR=0.74; 95% CI: 0.67-0.82; P<0.0001).1
*Hospitalization due to AFib and other supraventricular rhythm disorders was a component of the secondary endpoint of CV hospitalization.1
CV hospitalization in AFib + CAD (post hoc)
ATHENA post hoc analysis primary composite endpoint:
Time to first CV hospitalization or death from any cause in patients with
AFib + CAD (n=1405)2,3
Study limitations3
- Post hoc analysis where potential bias could be introduced, given that patients were randomized based on CAD status. The analysis was retrospective, exploratory, and based on a much smaller population than the full randomized population in the ATHENA trial
- In patients who had a history of CAD, patients receiving MULTAQ had similar rates of any TEAEs and serious TEAEs as patients receiving placebo, but had significantly higher rates of bradycardia, QT interval prolongation, gastrointestinal events, and increases in serum creatinine
ATHENA Post Hoc Analysis
AFib + CAD
Results in the primary composite endpoint were consistent in patients with or without CAD (MULTAQ: 482/1663 or 29.52%; placebo: 567/1590 or 35.66%).3
This post hoc analysis assessed safety and cardiovascular outcomes of MULTAQ in a total of 1405 patients with CAD from the ATHENA study.3
CAD was defined as a documented history of either ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, evidenced by clinically significant left ventricular dilatation secondary to CAD, or CAD, which was defined as acute myocardial infarction and/or the following: significant (≥70%) coronary artery stenosis, history of revascularization procedure (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, stent implantation in a coronary artery, coronary artery bypass grafting, etc), positive exercise test, and positive nuclear scan of cardiac perfusion.3
ATHENA was a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled study.
Population: Patients with paroxysmal or persistent AFib/AFL who were >/=75 years old, or >/=70 years old with at least one risk factor who experienced AFib/AFL within 6 months and were in sinus rhythm
Primary composite endpoint: First hospitalization due to CV event or death from any cause
Clinical evaluations on Days 7 and 14, and at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12, and every 3 months thereafter.2
Mean follow-up was 21±5 months.2
*There were no significant differences between the 2 groups for any of the baseline characteristics, with the exception of the proportion of study patients who were women, which was significantly greater in the MULTAQ group (P=0.002).
†Complete data on structural heart disease were available for 2281 of the 2301 patients receiving MULTAQ, and for 2304 of the 2327 patients receiving placebo, for a total of 4585 patients.
‡For left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), data were available for 2263 of the 2301 patients receiving MULTAQ, and for 2281 of the 2327 patients receiving placebo, for a total of 4544 patients. The category of LVEF less than 45% included the patients with LVEF of less than 35%.
§Lone atrial fibrillation was defined as atrial fibrillation in the absence of cardiovascular disease and extracardiac precipitating causes of atrial fibrillation.
AAD=antiarrhythmic drug; ADONIS=American–Australian–African Trial With Dronedarone in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation or Atrial Flutter Patients for the Maintenance of Sinus Rhythm; AE=adverse event; AFib=atrial fibrillation; AFL=atrial flutter; ATHENA=A Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Parallel Arm Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Dronedarone 400 mg bid for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Hospitalization or Death From Any Cause in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation/Atrial Flutter; CAD=coronary artery disease; CI=confidence interval; CV=cardiovascular; ECG=electrocardiogram; EURIDIS=European Trial in Atrial Fibrillation or Flutter Patients Receiving Dronedarone for the Maintenance of Sinus Rhythm; HFpEF=heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HR=hazard ratio; RRR=relative risk reduction; TEAE=treatment-emergent adverse event.
References:
1. MULTAQ [package insert]. Morristown, NJ. Sanofi.
2. Hohnloser SH, Crijns HJ, van Eickels M, et al. Effect of dronedarone on cardiovascular events in atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(7):668-678.
3. Vamos M, Calkins H, Kowey PR, et al. Efficacy and safety of dronedarone in patients with a prior ablation for atrial fibrillation/flutter: Insights from the ATHENA study. Clin Cardiol. 2020;43(3):291-297.